Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Read

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff, crossing with a “walk” light in a marked crosswalk, was injured when she came into contact with defendant’s automobile. She brought action for damages, and appeals from a judgment for the defendant.

Of the eleven assignments of error, the only one ■that requires extended discussion concerns the refusal to give an instruction requested by plaintiff.

The request was patterned after an instruction found in Bracht v. Palace Laundry Co., 156 Or 151, 157-158, 65 P2d 1039 (1937). As given in that case, the instruction told the jury that a plaintiff charged with contributory negligence had-…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. PennerOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bracht v. Palace Laundry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Stanich v. BUCKLEYOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. HolstOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API