Legal Opinion

Loew v. Antonick

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1956No. 6052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY C. KELLY, Superior Court Judge.

The action was begun by appellant, as plaintiff, to recover payments made by his predecessor in interest, as lessee, to appellees as lessors, for the rent of the last five months of a five-year term, the tenant having defaulted in the payment of current rent near midway of the term and the possession having been retaken by the landlord. The claim is that these payments have unjustly enriched the landlord, that it is inequitable that he should retain them, and that the tenancy being terminated they should be returned to the lessee. The plaintiff is not the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Dutton v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ramish v. WorkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Curtis v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Schuldes v. WubboldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Lochner, Receiver v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API