Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Melvin Brown was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and violating the Georgia Driver’s License Act by driving after being declared a habitual violator. He appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to show that he was the driver and that the trial court erred in considering his prior convictions in aggravation of sentence. For reasons discussed below, we affirm.
1. Brown does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence as to his impairment, but argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that he was driving.
On appeal from a criminal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Stripling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006