Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Wirecut E.D.M., Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided February 16, 2005No. 05-04-00440-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
Deputy Constable Don Freeman brings this interlocutory appeal challenging portions of the trial court’s order denying certain of his pleas to the jurisdiction and motions for summary judgment in this case. In four issues, Freeman challenges the trial court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit and argues he is immune from liability for claims brought against him. We agree with the trial court on all grounds appealed, and we affirm its order.
Background
Appellee Wirecut E.D.M., Inc. leased a Robofil Model 6020 Wire E.D.M. machine (the “Machine”)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dallas County v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Dallas County v. Wadley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Chambers v. Pruitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Souder v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Welch v. Milton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.