Legal Opinion

Warehousing Service, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 31, 1966No. C.D. 2643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Chief Judge:

The collector of customs at the port of Los Angeles assessed duty upon an importation of metal insert bearings at the rate of 9% per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 369 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by Presidential Proclamation No. 3468, 97 Treas. Dec. 157, T.D. 55615, supplemented by Presidential Proclamation No. 3479,97 Treas. Dec. 430, T. D. 55649, for parts of automobiles.

By timely protest, plaintiff has challenged that assessment contending that the subject merchandise is dutiable at only 7% per centum ad valorem, as parts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warehousing Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beck Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Johnson Motors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Castelazo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API