Legal Opinion
In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. S-624
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 22, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3576PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
Appellant, the Department of Economic Security (DES), claims that it sustained its burden of proving the grounds alleged in its petition to sever the parental rights of the natural father of two minor children. We find no basis for overturning the juvenile court’s determination and affirm.
Appellant filed a petition to sever the parental rights of both the natural mother and father. 1 As to the father, the petition alleged that he had abandoned the children and had made no effort to maintain a parental relationship with them. It also alleged that he had been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Rose G.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hennepin County Welfare Department v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Arizona State Department of Economic Security v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- James S. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-1607Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-4374Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.