Arco Alaska, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Mapco Alaska Petroleum, Inc., Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
The heyday of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (“TAPS”) is over. The large oil fields on the North Slope, from which the pipeline has long carried oil 800 miles to Valdez, are aging. With the decline in production TAPS is carrying fewer barrels of petroleum today than in the past. This decline has critical implications for rates charged on the pipeline.
Petitioners challenge the continued validity of a ratemaking method designed when the pipeline operated at capacity to compensate for the greater…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Watt v. Energy Action Educational FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005