Seibert v. Cavender
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Sess. Acts 1870, p. 480, sec. 8, pp. 481, 482, secs. 14, 15, 17, 19 ; Weber v. Scherguis, 59 Mo. 389; Carroll v. Eaton, 2 Mo. App. 479. cited: The State v. City of St. Louis, 56 Mo. 277; Sheenan v. Gleason, 46 Mo. 100; Carlin v. Cavender, 56 Mo. 286; Acts 1870, p. 479, sec. 7; Neenan v. Smith, 60 Mo. 292.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
This is a suit on a special tax bill, dated April 19, 1872, amounting to $413.45,'for curbing, guttering, and macadamizing done in front of defendant’s lot, in the city of St. Louis. The court, sitting as a jury, rendered judgment for the plaintiff.
The defendant ashed for eight instructions, which were refused. This refusal comprehending all the errors alleged, we will consider, in order, the points made thereupon.
City ordinance No. 7741, under which the work was done, provides for the grading, curbing, guttering, and macadamizing of about twenty streets. Section 18, article 8, of the City…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Cavender v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. A. H. Read Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Clough v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Frazier v. City of RockportMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Maurer v. WernerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988