Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Parker

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1997No. 97-SC-517-MRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on motion of appellant Harold McQueen, Jr., for interlocutory relief prior to entry of a final judgment. CR 65.07. In the court below, injunctive relief in the form of a stay of execution was denied, and inasmuch as the underlying issue concerns imposition of the death penalty, review of the trial court’s interlocutory order in this Court is proper. Skaggs v. Commonwealth, Ky., 803 S.W.2d 573, 577 (1990).

Appellant is scheduled to die by means of electrocution pursuant to KRS 431.220 before sunrise on Tuesday, July 1, 1997. In this action he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Gomez v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Workman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Baze v. ReesKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McKinney v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API