Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Myers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentGibson, J.
I am of opinion the affirmance of the judgment cannot be justified on sound principles of law. I am of the further opinion the majority has injected into the appeal and held as decisive of a vital issue therein matter that is neither pertinent to nor properly to be considered in the determination of such issue. And, since the holding, if left undisturbed, will, as a precedent, prove fruitful of injustice, I feel compelled to state my views.
The issue in question is whether the court erred in overruling the motion of *158defendant to require plaintiff to submit to an examination by physicians to be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Gulf, C. Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Brown WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Kingfisher v. AltizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.