State ex rel. Kmart Corp. (K-Mart) v. Frantom
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 30.] THE STATE EX REL. KMART CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. FRANTOM ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. Frantom,
1999-Ohio-180.] Appellate procedure—Administrative law—Final orders—Interlocutory discovery order—Mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal or to create an appeal from an order that is not final. (No. 97-1655—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided September 15, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD09-1257. __________________ Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Sobczav. SkowOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Williams v. Moody's of Dayton, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Groff v. Indus. Commiss., 08ap-697 (4-30-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009