Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Buffalo China, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law by vacating the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering and as modified affirmed without costs and new trial granted on damages for past and future pain and suffering only unless defendant, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulates to increase the verdict on damages for past and future pain and suffering to $250,000, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as modified affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover *881damages for personal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peck v. Tired Iron Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. 72nd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Trala v. EgloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Edwards v. Stamford Healthcare Society, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Schmidt v. BartolottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. DePasquale v. KlenetskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API