Legal Opinion

Sowers v. Corthell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1952No. 2501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Chief Justice.

This is an action brought by plaintiff and respondent against Irving Corthell, defendant and appellant, to re cover damages from the appellant by reason of the fact that the latter’s cattle consumed or destroyed certain hay of the plaintiff in the City of Laramie. The cattle were kept adjacent to the City of Laramie. The plaintiff’s premises are located about two blocks away and inside the city’s limits. The cattle left or were permitted to leave the place where they were usually kept and invaded plaintiff’s premises where they consumed or destroyed the hay in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wigginton & Sweeney v. Bruce's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Adams Bros. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Brady v. StraubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Garretson v. AveryWyoming Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. SiltamakiWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  2. SaBell's, Inc. v. FlensColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Stilwell Ex Rel. Stilwell v. NationWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  4. SaBell's, Inc. v. FlensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API