Legal Opinion

Grimm v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 2016No. 49/15PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this ease, we address the rule requiring corroboration of a defendant’s extrajudicial confession, as well as what permissible inferences a fact-finder may deduce based on testimony from a non-party witness in the event the fact-finder disbelieves that testimony.

Quentin Anthony Grimm (“the alleged victim” or “Quentin”) moved in with his biological father, John Grimm, and his stepmother, Angela Ann Grimm (“Petitioner”), in 2009 when Quentin was sixteen years old. In early 2013, a deputy assigned to a local high school came into possession of an anonymous letter that raised concerns about the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Warszower v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stracke v. Estate of ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  3. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. Potts v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API