Legal Opinion

Sulyma v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1988No. Appeal No. 1853 C.D. 1987Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

Onfrey Sulyma (Claimant) petitions for review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dismissing his claim petition under the occupational disease provisions of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 PS. §§1-1601.1. We affirm.

Claimant was employed as a custodian for Miners-ville Area School District (Employer) from 1957 to 1977. Prior to 1957, Claimant worked as an underground miner in the anthracite coal mining industry for ten years. From 1957 to 1968, Claimant worked in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Werner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Mathies Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Bruckner v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Harkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Shemanski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API