Legal Opinion
Federal Pacific Electric Co. v. McAdams
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 22, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBaer, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the defendants’ affirmative defense on the ground that it is insufficient in law; and secondly, to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground of (a) insuffi*526ciency; (b) that it was not interposed by the real party in interest; (e) that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter.
I shall first consider that part of the motion directed to the counterclaim. If the third contention, to wit: ‘ ‘ that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter ” is sound, it will be unnecessary to consider the other two. The substance of this contention is that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Mitchell v. Flintkote Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. PaddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Bradley v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.