Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Consumer Automotive Resources, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1994No. 64391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Judge.

Defendants Consumer Automotive Resources (C.A.R.), William Herbert, and Robert Warren appeal from a summary judgment finding that they had operated a pyramid sales scheme in violation of § 407.400 RSMo 1986 and § 407.405 RSMo 1986. 1 Defendants claim the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against them, in ordering that funds sequestered vest in the State as an equitable fine or forfeiture, and in imposing civil penalties pursuant to § 407.-100.6 without hearing further evidence. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Defendants promoted a multi-level…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Lucas v. EnkvetchakulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Ashcroft v. ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chouteau Auto Mart, Inc. v. First Bank of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Ditto, Incorporated v. Heather Davids, Chris Davids and Revive Lee's Summit, LLC, F/K/A Ditto Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Glasgow Enterprises, Inc. v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. McCain v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Frye v. Future Inns of America-Huntington, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API