Turner v. State

1. The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for continuance.

2. There was no material variance between the bill of exceptions and the record.

3. An assignment of error on a ground in a motion for a new trial not approved by the judge will not be considered.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 17, 1942.

The defendant abandoned the general grounds of the motion for new trial. We will therefore deal with the exceptions pendente lite and the errors complained of in the amended motion.

The exceptions pendente lite are: "When said case was called, and before trial of the same, the question arose, on…