State v. Langston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant, Jesse Langston, appeals the denial of a motion for continuance made by his appointed counsel when appellant failed to appear at his trial. Appellant was found guilty by a jury of resisting arrest, a misdemeanor. A sealed sentence was imposed by the trial judge. Appellant contends that conducting the trial in absentia violated his constitutional rights. We disagree and affirm.
Appellant was released after his arrest in September, 1979 on a recognizance bond which required him to appear at trial “when notified” and to advise the court of any change of address. The record reveals that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CrosscupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Guy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Hopkins v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002