Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1898No. 3135PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. Leander H. Prather, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the respondent on a judgment obtained in the state of Idaho. The respondent moves to dismiss this appeal for the following reasons: (1) Because no bill of exceptions or statement of facts has been settled or certified as provided by law, or at all; (2) because the alleged notice of application to settle bill of exceptions or statement of facts is wholly insufficient; (3) because the certificate of the trial judge is wholly insufficient, and not such a certificate as is required by law, or any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Cahoon v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Love v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Williams v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Bourgeious v. Santa Fe Trail Stages, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Furniture Co. v. AbramsNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Von Arx v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API