Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1998No. 97-2864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In his motion for postconviction relief, appellant charged that he was entitled to withdraw his plea because the conditions of the plea had been frustrated, thus rendering the plea involuntary. Specifically, appellant had agreed to plead to the charges in state court with the representation that he would be released to federal custody to serve time in connection with federal charges. Thus, his *122state sentence and federal sentence would run concurrently. He alleges that the federal authorities have not transported him to federal facilities; thus, his sentence is being carried out differently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Pearson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Benson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monestime v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API