Legal Opinion

Sooter v. Magic Lantern, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1989No. 15938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Dean Sooter and his wife, Dorothy Sooter, filed suit based on a promissory note of Magic Lantern, Inc. The note was in the principal sum of $16,000. Following a jury trial, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $2,191.35 principal, $666.54 interest, and $2,000 for the cost of collection. The plaintiffs appeal.

Two points are raised on appeal. The first point is that the trial court erred in giving an instruction which submitted the defense of lack of consideration to the jury. In their second point, plaintiffs allege that the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Crystal Tire Co. v. Home Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Wilks v. StoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of Gross v. GrossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Martens v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Morgan Publications, Inc. v. Squire Publishers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Environmental Quality Research, Inc. v. Mercantile Trust National Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API