Farthing v. . Dark
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a petition of the plaintiff to rehear this case, as reported in 109 N. C., 291.
1Opinion of the Court
Avery, J.:
The note assigned for value and before maturity was, upon its face, made “negotiable and payable at Durham Fence Factory, or office of Wortham, Warren & Co. Planing Mills." The plaintiff testified that when he bought the note he knew there was no factory in Durham “called the Durham Fence Factory;” but neither plaintiff, defendant, nor any other witness, disputed the fact stated by the witness Wortham, as well as Justice, who was introduced by the defendant, that there was a place of business in the town well known as the “office of Wortham & Co.” If, therefore, we concede the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Railroad Companies v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Jackson v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Hulbert v. . DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Tredwell v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Campbell v. . McCormacSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of Sampson v. HatcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Culbreth v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- J. L. Smathers & Co. v. Toxaway Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Standing Stone National Bank v. WalserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Myers v. PettySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.