Legal Opinion · Dissent
IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 2007Published
1DissentMcGuire, J.
The principal issues on appeal in this action brought by plaintiff-respondent IDT Corporation against defendants-appellants Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated (collectively, Morgan Stanley) center on the extent to which IDT’s claims against Morgan Stanley are barred by either the doctrine of collateral estoppel on account of an earlier arbitration proceeding IDT brought against nonparty Telefonica International, S.A. or the statute of limitations.
In May 2001, IDT commenced an arbitration proceeding against Telefonica alleging that IDT had sustained over $2…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ross v. Louise Wise Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.