Legal Opinion
United States v. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 28, 1944No. 8436PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendants and one Schímkus, who was acquitted, were indicted for conspiracy with other persons unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit certain offenses, namely, to acquire, earmark for export and export gold bullion in bar or in converted similitudes of coins of the United States in violation of Executive Order 6260, 12 U.S.C.A. § 95 note, promulgated under authority of the Act of October 6, 1917, the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1 et seq., while having no license so to do; to counterfeit coins in violation of Section 277 of Title 18…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Murphy v. CadyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
- Beland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Morrison v. ColleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Bates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- United States v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.