Gillespie v. Steiger
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, P.J.
In accordance with the provision of Dist/Mun. Cts. R Civ. P., Rule 64(d), the motion judge reported to this division his interlocutory ruling that this civil action *34could not be removed to the superior court under the provisions of G.Lc. 231, §104, because the amount of damages sought did not exceed $25,000. We are unable to review this ruling because the report does not contain plaintiffs Statement of Damages.
In order to know the amount of the claim in a civil action, Supplemental Rule 102A requires that in all civil actions governed by the District/Municipal Courts Rules of Civil Procedure,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Chumbiray v. Central-Chrysler Plymouth Jeep EagleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999