Local Union No. 636, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board found that the petitioner union engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(b) (4) (i) and (ii) (B) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (4) (i) and (ii) (B) (1964). In finding that the union had engaged in proscribed secondary activity, the Board relied exclusively on its “right to control” test. For the reasons set out below, we believe this reliánce was misplaced, and we reverse the Board’s finding.
I
The facts are undisputed. At all times relevant to this case Local 636 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- American Boiler Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Local Union No. 636 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Fischback & Moore of Alaska, Inc. v. LynnAlaska Supreme Court · 1969