Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 2000No. 5—98—0434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

Defendant appeals from his conviction of the offense of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child (720 ILCS 5/12 — 14.1(a)(1) (West 1996)). Defendant contends that his right to a fair trial was violated (1) when the trial judge read a transcript of the complaining witness’s testimony to the jury during deliberations and (2) when the court admitted a highly prejudicial and irrelevant statement made by defendant. For reasons we will more fully explain, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On New Year’s Day 1998, Tanya Harmon took her daughter, B.C., then six years old, to the emergency room of St.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. People v. WillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. AlvaradoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API