Legal Opinion

Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Alpena; Connine, J. Garnishment proceedings by the Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Company, a foreign corporation, against Samuel B. Kahn, garnishee of Joseph Anderson, principal defendant. Judgment for defendant garnishee. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Joseph Anderson, the principal defendant, was the owner of a stock of groceries and meats in the city of Harrisville, which he transferred to one John A. Stewart by bill of sale. The latter in turn sold the same to the garnishee defendant. Both sales were in violation of Act No. 223, Pub. Acts 1905, known as the “Sales in Bulk Act.” The plaintiff sued and obtained a judgment against the principal defendant for $161.80 damages and costs $2.30, and garnished Kahn. Upon a trial of the garnishment suit in justice’s court the plaintiff recovered, but upon *350an appeal to the circuit court a verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beard v. ClippertMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCuaig v. City Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cardiff Gypsum Plaster Co. v. Hales Coal & Material Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. Traeger ex rel. Sachs v. National Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918
  3. Williams v. Banana Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Meier v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Resler v. SeamanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API