Legal Opinion
State v. Knight
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 6, 1921No. 10760PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Before Gary, J., Greenwood, June term, 1920. cite: Prosecution under Sec. 44J Crim. Code ipi2; taking property into, another State does not constitute a disposition of it within the Act: 43 S. C. 200; 74 S. C. 450.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. ChiUU Justice Gary.
The defendant was charged with disposing of an automobile over which the Overland-Greenville Company held a mortgage, in violation of Section 447 of the Criminal Code, which provides: ■ •
“Any person or persons who shall sell or dispose of any personal property on which any mortgage or lien exists, without the written consent of the mortgagee or lienee, or the owner or holder of such mortgage or lien, and shall fail to pay the debt secured by the same within ten days after such sale or disposal, * * * shall be deemed guilty of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hill v. Winnsboro Granite Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
- State v. HaynesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. EpesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946