Legal Opinion
Henry v. Farmer City State Bank
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 1989No. 85-3365PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
A matter of sanctions.1
They are imposed against Plaintiffs’ attorney.
The facts of this cause have been well chronicled. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 808 F.2d 1228 (7th Cir.1986); Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 651 F.Supp. 17 (C.D.Ill.1985); Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 630 F.Supp. 844 (C.D.Ill.1986); Farmer City State Bank v. Henry, 138 Ill.App.3d 854, 93 Ill.Dec. 196, 486 N.E.2d 297 (1985); Farmer City State Bank v. Champaign National Bank, 138 Ill.App.3d 847, 93 Ill.Dec. 200, 486 N.E.2d 301 (1985).
We hit only the highlights here.
I—Facts
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1992
- Harrison v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Lolling v. PattersonDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1991