Southwest Research Institute v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
Southwest Research Institute, a Texas nonprofit corporation, appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a peremptory writ of mandate. On appeal, Southwest contends that, for purposes of paying unemployment benefits, Jeffery A. Yingst 1 was an independent contractor, not an employee, of Southwest. For several years, Yingst worked as a vendor for Southwest, obtaining gasoline samples for testing. Respondent, the Employment Development Department, defends the benefit decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, affirming the administrative…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Briggs v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Idaho Times Publishing Co v. Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- First Aid Services of San Diego, Inc. v. California Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- West Hollywood Community Health & Fitness Center v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Morales Posada v. Cultural Care, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021