Legal Opinion

Springer v. Kuhns

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1997No. A-96-562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Judge.

This opinion addresses the effect the passage in 1995 of L.B. 251, now codified as Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-691 (Cum. Supp. 1996), had on the validity of an agreement reached in 1989 to transfer ground water off overlying land to an adjacent tract for agricultural purposes. Inherent in this determination is the recitation of some history of ground water law and an examination of the intent of the Legislature in enacting L.B. 251.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 1989, Mark L. Springer and Carole D. Springer owned approximately 80 acres located in the east half of the northwest quarter of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sporhase v. Nebraska Ex Rel. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Goolsby v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Solar Motors v. First Nat. Bank of ChadronNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woodroffe v. Estate of WoodroffeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Chadd v. Lower Platte South Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In The Matter Of The Estate Of Glenn W. Woodroffe, Randolph W. Woodroffe And Janice M. Woodroffe Vs. The Estate Of Glenn W. Woodroffe, Elda H. Woodroffe, Jeanne A. Woodroffe, Reginald Woodroffe, Kerwin Woodroffe, And Anita L. EricksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API