Legal Opinion

First Security Bank of Utah v. Proudfit Sporting Goods Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1976No. 14301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a foreclosure judgment declared to have priority over a mortgage asserted by Remington against Proudfit, First Security’s mortgagee in point of time. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

In 1967, Proudfit borrowed $45,000 from First Security, executing a mortgage securing a note for that amount. In November, 1970, the note had not been paid in full. At the request of Proudfit a trust deed was executed for the unpaid balance, plus an additional advance for a total of $63,000 indebtedness, securing a renewal note. This trust deed was given, as recited therein, to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. KapposUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Interstate Trust Co. v. HeadlundUtah Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marking Systems, Inc. v. Interwest Film Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
  3. Jones v. American Coin Portfolios, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jeppesen v. Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Durham v. Mountain America Credit Union (In re Durham)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API