Legal Opinion

In re Consolazio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) to obtain judicial approval of a compromise and settlement nunc pro tunc, (1) Merchants Mutual Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered April 29, 1999, as directed that it continue to pay benefits to the petitioner, and (2) the petitioner cross-appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of the same order as denied her petition.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision that directs the appellant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Font v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Baiano v. SquiresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Harosh v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northrop v. ThorsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Zamfino v. FurmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Furtado v. Mario's BakeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API