Legal Opinion

Schaumburg v. Grishman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 22, 1925No. 27266Published

1Opinion

On the Merits.

This suit was before us in June, 1925, on a motion to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that, due to the fault of defendant, who is the appellant, the parol evidence adduced on the trial had not been preserved, and therefore was not in the transcript. The motion to dismiss was denied on the ground that, if in passing upon the case, it should become necessary to examine the evidence, and it appeared that the failure to preserve the evidence is not attributable to the fault of appellant, the judgment appealed from might be set aside, and the case remanded to be tried again, and,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Garment Co. v. NewburgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Durke v. CraneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Manning v. ShawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Henry Rose Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. StearnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API