Legal Opinion

Tibbetts v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion to Dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

The petitioner alleges that ninety-two bales of cotton, grown and secured by him on his plantation in Carroll parish, in the State of Louisiana, were seized and taken from him under an order by General McPherson, commanding forces of the United States, and sold for the sum of #19,864 18 net, which was and still is retained by the government ; and he claims these proceeds under the act of 1863, c. 120, which provides that any person claiming to have been the owner of such abandoned or captured property may, at any time within two years after the suppression of the rebellion, prefer his claim…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Thomas's administrator v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
  3. Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API