Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Durham

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action for slander defendant is principal of a high school and plaintiff was a student therein. Defendant’s duty required him to communicate to the Board of Education the fact that rumors concerning plaintiff were circulated among the students and teachers. In so acting he was protected by a qualified privilege and is free from liability unless his conduct resulted from malice. That there was no actual malice is conceded. There is no evidence that defendant acted with a wanton and reckless disregard of plaintiff’s rights or otherwise than in good faith. (Pecue v. West, 233 N. Y. 316,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pecue v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Teichner v. BellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Nunan v. BullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. McAulay v. MaloffCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API