Beckman v. Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
The issue raised in this appeal from a lower court’s dismissal of preliminary objections to a petition for appointment of viewers is whether the evidence supports an alleged de facto taking.
Helen E. Beckman and Wilson W. Movie (petitioners) are the administrators of the estate of Clarence M. Raible. They are also the administrators of the estate of George J. Raible. During their lifetimes, the Raible brothers individually acquired two contiguous lots by separate deeds apparently executed the same day by the same grantor. The lots were used as a parking lot in the City…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In re Condemnation by the CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Espy v. Butler Area Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Lando v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. Greenfield Township—Property OwnersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990