Legal Opinion

Delano v. Equitable Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for judgment on the pleadings.

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

The rule, that a bank may look to deposits in its hands for the repayment of any indebtedness to it on the part of the depositor and may apply the debtor’s deposits on his debt to the bank as it becomes due, is so well established as to render unnecessary here a citation of the long line of cases. *705See 7 C. J. 653. In the case at bar the question, which arises upon a motion for judgment on the pleadings, is, whether such a right of setoff can be exercised without notice to the depositor. The material facts of lEeseparate defense which show that the payment of plaintiff’s checks was refused…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Commercial Bank v. HughesNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Meyers v. New York County National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Marsh v. Oneida Central BankNew York Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of LofmarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  2. In re the Estate of ForrestNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In re the Estate of VicinusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API