Legal Opinion

Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 11, 1942No. 910Published

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover profits for patent infringement established by Judge Nields of the District Court of Delaware in the case of Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Hosiery Mills, D.C., 1 F.Supp. 643, affirmed 72 F.2d 47, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 595, 55 S.Ct. 109, 79 L.Ed. 688. Plaintiff’s patent covers the construction of the top or welt of a lady’s silk stockings, which, by reason of three separately spaced rows of stitching (known as hemlocks) can be adjusted to the length of the leg of the wearer by being folded over at the top. Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API