Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1924No. 6 Div. 459PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The appellant was convicted of forgery in the second degree. The indictment follows the form laid down for forgery in the second degree in so far as that form covers section 6910, Code 1907, except that it contains the following additional words, "and the grand jury further charge that said alteration, forgery or counterfeiting consisted in signing the name of J.R. Upshaw where the same appears on the face of said instrument." Form 62, p. 670, Code 1907. There…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Amos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Childress v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  4. Harbin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Waller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API