Lee v. Onstott
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Eekoe to Pulaski Circuit Court. On the 26th day of November, 1832, Doctors Cocke and Lee of the one part, and Pratt Collins, the defendant’s intestate, of the other, entered into an agreement in substance as follows: That having theretofore entered into an agreement to keep and furnish a livery stable in partnership and being unable to effect a settlement, they did, in order to accomplish that object, and to avoid all difficulty, “ mutually agreed to submit for arbitration,…
Read the full summary
Eekoe to Pulaski Circuit Court. On the 26th day of November, 1832, Doctors Cocke and Lee of the one part, and Pratt Collins, the defendant’s intestate, of the other, entered into an agreement in substance as follows: That having theretofore entered into an agreement to keep and furnish a livery stable in partnership and being unable to effect a settlement, they did, in order to accomplish that object, and to avoid all difficulty, “ mutually agreed to submit for arbitration, and award all matters of controversy between them, to final hearing and decision,” of two arbitrators named therein,…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, Judge
This suit was commenced before a Justice of the Peace, by the intestate, against Cocke and Lee, on an account founded upon an award. Judgment was rendered against them, from which they appealed to the Circuit Court of Pulaski county. After the appeal, Collins died, and the suit was revived in the name of Onstott, his administrator, a new trial had, and judgment rendered against the defendants, and Elias Rector as their security in appeal. After judgment in the Circuit Court, Cocks died; and this cause is now brought up by Lee and Rector as his security. Various causes for reversal are…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
- Rutherford v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Tully v. LewitzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906