Holtzman v. Hopwood Realty, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin county. The defendants, appellants herein, have filed 25 assignments of error. The court does not believe it would serve any useful purpose to treat each assignment of error separately.
With respect to the first cause of action, the main contention of defendants is that the settlement and dismissal of two actions in the Court of Common Pleas, Franklin county, constitute resjudicata. The record shows that in 1942 Ida Earnhart held a note against the plaintiff, appellee herein, Holtzman, which was secured…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Simmons v. Becker, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmes v. PottsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Highland v. Hix (In Re Hix)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
- Tonwe v. Harris-Miles (In Re Harris-Miles)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Holmes v. PottsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Petersen Painting & Home Improvement, Inc. v. ZnidarsicOhio Court of Appeals · 1991