Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 17, 1992No. 1 CA-CR 91-1013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.
The state appeals from the trial court's granting of appellee’s motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized from his person. For the reasons below, we affirm.
On September 28, 1989, Randy Weems (“Weems”), an officer with the Flagstaff Police Department, obtained a search warrant for the premises at 36 Brannen Circle in Flagstaff, Arizona, and for the persons of Carmen Johns, Jo Hamilton, “Iceman, a black male” and “Jim, a black male”. This warrant was issued on the basis of an affidavit by Weems which stated that he had “information from a confidential and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Enrique EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Augustine FerroneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GuadarramaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. BlackmoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995