Piascik v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
The libellant’s contention that the libel states a cause of action under Public Law 17, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1291, can not be sustained because the law expressly provides that it applies only to seamen employed through the War Ship-' ping Administration, and because there is no allegation of such fact. Nor can the contention that the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 applies, be sustained. The Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 741-752, provides a remedy against the United States. This is the exclusive remedy against the United States on the facts alleged. Johnson v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by12 opinions
- Foote v. Public Housing Com'r of United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Crescitelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Keil v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1946
- Kakara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Piascik v. Trader Navigation Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.