Legal Opinion

Piascik v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 21, 1944PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

The libellant’s contention that the libel states a cause of action under Public Law 17, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1291, can not be sustained because the law expressly provides that it applies only to seamen employed through the War Ship-' ping Administration, and because there is no allegation of such fact. Nor can the contention that the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 applies, be sustained. The Suits in Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 741-752, provides a remedy against the United States. This is the exclusive remedy against the United States on the facts alleged. Johnson v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Blamberg Brothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foote v. Public Housing Com'r of United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  2. Crescitelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Keil v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1946
  4. Kakara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Piascik v. Trader Navigation Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API