Legal Opinion

Short v. Looney

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

Petitioner, off duty and while operating a truck in the course of a private employment, asked two girls whether they would like to observe him indulge in an act which, at worst, *579and in context, could be termed indecent. Indeed, the District Attorney of the county found no facts warranting prosecution other than for harassment; but, in any event, the girls ’ parents declined to prosecute. Petitioner professed to have no recollection of his acts for the period in question and for some part of that afternoon.

After the hearing, but before the determination, respondent Commissioner,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dobrin v. SafirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. JAMES ROBERT "JIM BOB" and SHARON INFANGER, Husband and Wife, Individually, and as Natural Parents of CHELSEA BRITTNEY INFANGER, Deceased; And JAMES ROBERT "JIM BOB" INFANGER, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF CHELSEA BRITTNEY INFANGER v. THE STATE OF IDAHO, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF AERONAUTICSIdaho Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API