Legal Opinion

Van v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 29, 1967No. 72, Initial Term, 1967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Arnold PI. Van, the appellant, complains of a conviction of larceny after trust under a three count indictment, charging larceny, larceny after trust and embezzlement. He was acquitted of larceny and embezzlement in a trial before the court.

In November of 1964 Van was employed as Assistant Manager of the Glen Burnie Chevrolet and Cadillac Company. A Mr. and Mrs. Carson became interested in the purchase of a 1962 Chevrolet on the company’s used car lot. At the time the Carsons owned a 1958 Oldsmobile on which they owed $350.00 to the City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas. The Car-sons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Nolan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Finkelstein v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reckard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Farlow v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. League v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Spillers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Sparkman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API