Legal Opinion

Standley v. Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1898No. 3893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam:.

In August, 1897, the appellees who now move to dismiss this appeal, filed their complaint against the 'Crown Point & Virginia Gold Mining Company, the object *378of this action being to obtain the appointment of a receiver for, and to wind up the affairs of this company. A receiver was appointed. Appellants, with the exception of Mayhew, intervened for the purpose of protecting their rights in the property in which the company was interested, alleging that they were mortgage creditors of the company, who had foreclosed their mortgages and sold the property under decrees of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. The Farmers'loan and Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Dusing v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Prewitt v. PrewittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Baker v. Williams Banking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Taylor v. Colorado Iron WorksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Eckman v. PoorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Durst v. HaenniColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API