Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Levandosky

Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided September 29, 1930No. 446Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cummins, J.,

Defendant was indicted for malicious mischief, it being charged that he maliciously killed a dog. The case is before the court in banc upon motion to quash, defendant contending that under the Dog Law of May 11, 1921, P. L. 522, 528, defendant could not be indicted but only proceeded against summarily.

Section twenty-three of the Act of May 11, 1921, provides that it shall generally be unlawful to kill a licensed dog, and section thirty-six of this act, as amended by the Act of May 14, 1929, P. L. 1713, 1717, provides that, for a violation of the act, the offender, “upon conviction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WinkelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Railing v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  3. Julienne v. Mayor of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Nehr v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API